a Woman's Authority

More accurately, concerning an area of women's authority specified in the Bible...

Kevin Bauder wrote what I've posted below during a discussion on pastoral authority. Personally I found these thoughts more useful than the overall essay in stimulating my thoughts toward careful, biblical thinking.  Obviously, this is addressing a very particular slice of life, but it seems like one that should be given deeper thought, by men especially.

   [...] Significantly, 1 Timothy 5:14 does not present the wife exercising oikodespotein under her husband’s delegation, but under God’s. What this probably means is that a wife has a sphere of authority—actual, decision-making power—that comes directly from God and not by grant from her husband. Her responsibility is to govern the household. In a modern home, this responsibility would give her authority over such matters as meals, décor, and cleanliness. She can tell her husband to move the sofa. She can decide what color the walls will be, how to hang the drapes, and whether the home will have hardwood floors or wall-to-wall carpeting. She has the authority to order her husband to take out the garbage or to pick up his socks and put them in the hamper, and he needs to obey her.

Even though the text does not indicate that this household authority is mediated through the husband, a wise wife will exercise it deferentially rather than demandingly. Within his sphere of authority the husband will do the same. In any case, within a certain sphere the authority of the wife acts as a check upon and limitation of the patriarchal authority of the husband and father. [...]

 (The full essay: Bishops and Fathers.)

Visiting the city of Van

Several weeks ago, I got to visit a new city here in Turkey, which is actually a very old city.  It just happens to be the first I've visited there.  Because the girls were with me, I didn't get to explore in detail, and there's much more to see.  But at least we got to see the old castle, the site of the old city and Lake Van, which is pretty, though I didn't get a picture of it.

Van's old fortress can be seen at the end of the street

Van fortress with a restored mosque's minaret also visible

An ancient inscription from much earlier versions of the fortress

With the girls at the old city of Van, originally Tushpa capital of the Urartian kingdom

  There's lots of other stuff to see in the area.  Soon, a new museum should be finished with lots of ancient artifacts; there's an old cathedral on an island out in the lake, and Mount Ararat is not too far away.  It's a great place to visit, and I will hope to go back someday and keep seeing more.

The One-ness of God and Prejudice

  Earlier this week I watched a soccer game with one of my good friend who is atheistic; afterwards as we talked, he was surprised when I said that the duties of Jesus followers can be summarized in two commands: Love God; love your neighbors.  Coincidentally this week, I just read Jesus' expression of this truth in Mark 12, and I was struck by the fact that Jesus in this place quotes the entire command beginning with "Hear, O Israel," continuing through the expression of God's One-ness, His command to love Him with your whole wholeness and to love your neighbor as yourself.  Then, the entire sequence is repeated by the scribe to whom Jesus was talking.  Why is the One-ness of God so important to these commands?  

 I think this is related to the fact that there is only one God to worship, and so He must be worshipped supremely.  But regarding the second command particularly, the reflection of the One God in all of His created image-bearers is the cause for loving each of our neighbors as we love ourselves. In the first part of James 2, love of our neighbors is again given as a summary of the law; partiality and prejudice against any fellow human is a betrayal of divine law. (Interestingly, the unity of God is key to the argument in the second half of James 2.) 

 What's the point?  I think the point is that God's One-ness and supremacy creates the first command; His imparting of His image to people raises them to where they are each individually the object of the second command.  Any prejudice towards my neighbor is prejudice against the reflection of God in him or her. Obviously this does not address the fact that God's image in each of us has been marred, but prejudice suggests that I believe I was more worthy of God's restoring His image in me than such a restoration in my neighbor.  And that is not the Gospel. 

 If we believe in the greatness of the One God, if we love Him with all we are (by His grace), then we must love and embrace His reflection in all those around us! This truth is not simple: God's greatness and the honor that He has set upon each of us do not agree well with our natural self-righteousness, nor does it thrive in a secular mind. Yet no other way gives more than pragmatic honor to our neighbors: if we are each just working for our own good when we 'love our neighbor' this is no true love. The Lord God is one: love Him with all you are, and love those whom He has put around you as you love your own self.

(From a Trinitarian perspective, it is interesting that Jesus' next discussion in Mark 12 is about the divinity of the Messiah.)