Apparently I've never read C. S. Lewis's essay "The Weight of Glory" through from end to end before. I've read excerpts, but the complete argument that he makes in there doesn't seem to be in my memory anywhere.
So today (and a bit of yesterday) I read it. It is really beautiful with many areas that I highlighted. One in particular that I wanted to mention has to do with an argument that has often bothered me: that I should expect to be able to understand mysteries before having faith in them. For sure, faith should be rational to some extent, but at some point, it will certainly be ultra-rational since we don't really need "faith" for what we can see and understand completely. Why would I expect to understand God, the Maker of the Universe, and all His works and wisdom fully? If I did wouldn't that mean my mind was equal to or superior to Him? Anyways, here is a bit of Lewis on a similar theme. The essay is worth exploring for yourself whether you believe in Christianity or not; Lewis is making a substantial argument for it, which one does not necessarily have to be Christian to appreciate.
12 October 2019
The Puzzling or Repellent Aspects of Christianity
If Christianity could tell me no more of the far-off land than my own temperament led me to surmise already, then Christianity would be no higher than myself. If it has more to give me, I expect it to be less immediately attractive than "my own stuff." [...] If our religion is something objective, then we must never avert our eyes from those elements in it which seem puzzling or repellent; for it will be precisely the puzzling or the repellent which conceals what we do not know and need to know.
~ "The Weight of Glory"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)