Early in the pandemic season, I mentioned that I had been reading Honor, Patronage, Kinship, and Purity by David deSilva, and it came up again in my 2020 Reading List. Well, I'm still working my way through it, and after nearly every reading I want to tell someone how much I like it and get someone else to read it.
The book starts with a valuable discussion of how to engage meaningfully with honor-shame language in Scripture, particularly if you are from a 'Western' culture. It ranges across the New Testament and would make an excellent reference tool on the title subjects. Below I want to share some quotes from the book.
Regarding Jesus
No member of the Jewish community or the Greco-Roman society would have come to faith or joined the Christian movement without first accepting that God’s perspective on what kind of behavior merits honor differs exceedingly from the perspective of human beings, since the message about Jesus is that both the Jewish and Gentile leaders of Jerusalem evaluated Jesus, his convictions and his deeds as meriting a shameful death, but God overturned their evaluation of Jesus by raising him from the dead and seating him at God’s own right hand as Lord. (p. 51).
Regarding community
One’s fellow believers will be the most visible and, in many senses, the most available reflection of God’s estimation of the individual, and so the New Testament authors are deeply concerned with building up a strong community of faith that will reinforce individual commitment to the group. [...]
They were to be family, a call that was all the more essential given the networks of relationships that a believer could potentially lose in the ancient world. This kinship was to extend beyond the local group to the provision of hospitality to traveling sisters and brothers. Hospitality in the early church served to create strong bonds between local churches, [...] The love of sisters and brothers of Christ is most needed where the censure of society is most keenly felt. (p. 59-60)
Regarding being shamed
Because the unbelievers will use the power of shaming to impose their values on the believers, and to call them back to a way of life that supports and perpetuates the values of the non-Christian culture, it is imperative that the believers’ sense of worth be detached from the opinion of unbelievers. (p. 61)
To be shamed by the shameless is ultimately no shame at all. (p. 63)
[Referring to the beatitude regarding being reviled and persecuted...] The fact that Jews had for centuries revered the names of Jeremiah and Isaiah overturns any shame that their kings might have tried to impose upon them. The followers of Jesus can have the same confidence when they encounter impositions of dishonor from outside. (p. 68).
Regarding responding to shaming
The honorable person subjected to insult or to some other challenge to honor is culturally conditioned to retaliate, to offer a riposte (see discussion in chapter one) that will counter the challenge and preserve honor in the public eye intact. Christians confronted with such attacks on their honor as verbal challenges, reproachful speech and even physical affronts would be sorely tempted to respond in kind, playing out the challenge-riposte game before the onlookers. Beginning with Jesus, however, Christian leaders sought to cultivate a specifically Christian riposte— the believer is allowed to respond to the challenges made against his or her honor, but directed to do so in such a way as reflects to the outside world the virtues and values of the Christian group. You have heard that it was said, “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.” But I say to you, Do not resist an evildoer. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also; and if anyone wants to sue you and take your coat, give your cloak as well; and if anyone forces you to go one mile, go also the second mile. (Mt 5:38-41; see also Mt 5:44; Lk 6:28, 35)
[...]
Followers of Jesus overcome challenges to honor not through using the same currency of insult or violence that the outside world throws at them, but rather they meet hostility with generosity, violence with courageous refusal to use violence, curse with blessing from God’s inexhaustible resources of goodness and kindness. Paul expands on the teaching of Jesus by urging the Christian to “take thought for what is noble in the sight of all” (Rom 12:17) rather than repaying “evil for evil.” One finds in Paul and 1 Peter a deep concern to demonstrate to outsiders that being Christian is in fact honorable. (p. 70-71)
This book has easily joined my favorites on the topic of honor, shame, and their surrounding topics, along with Roland Muller's Honor and Shame and Jackson Wu's One Gospel for All Nations. It is somewhat more academic but not in an unreadable way at all. Overall, it is continuing to add significantly to my collection of thoughts on this topic, many of which have been gathered here over the years.
