Two burdens of Jesus on the cross

   I was reading this morning in I Timothy 5 about the church's care of widows; as I tried to understand the section better, I read this in John MacArthur's commentary I Timothy.

    "Jesus spoke from the cross to only two individuals.  He forgave the dying thief, and arranged for the care of His widowed mother.  Nothing so clearly reveal the heart of God as that.  While bearing the burden of the world's sins, Jesus' mind was concerned with the salvation of one sinner, and the care of one widow." (emphasis mine)

The Missional Church

In "The Missional Church," Tim Keller speaks to transformation that is needed within the American Church today.  I do not agree with everything said in the article, but much of it is really helpful.  The three paragraphs given below are from different contexts in his 3-page article.  I would note that my biggest disagreement with this article is that I do not think every aspect of the church should revolve around outreach; however, the point is that we must think of our mission even as we worship, disciple, have community, and serve. 

"But the church in the West had not become completely 'missional'--adapting and reformulating absolutely everything it did in worship, discipleship, community, and service--so as to be engaged with the non-Christian society around it. It had not developed a 'missiology of western culture' the way it had done so for other non-believing cultures. ...

In a 'missional' church, the laity needs theological education to 'think Christianly' about everything and work with Christian distinctiveness. They need to know: a) what cultural practices are common grace and to be embraced, b) what practices are antithetical to the gospel and must be rejected, c) what practices can be adapted/revised. ...

In general, a church must be more deeply and practically committed to deeds of compassion and social justice than traditional liberal churches and more deeply and practically committed to evangelism and conversion than traditional fundamentalist churches. This kind of church is profoundly 'counter-intuitive' to American observers. It breaks their ability to categorize (and dismiss) it as liberal or conservative. Only this kind of church has any chance in the non-Christian west. ..."

"By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another."

NHCLC blog - enlightening

The blog for the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference is an excellent way to educate yourself about the issues facing our Latino brothers and sisters.  These two most recent posts are very enlightening; I haven't gotten to the rest yet.

More info on the NHCLC is available here at their website.

Toward a more Christ-like way of thinking...

Two good posts from Naselli

Andy Naselli's blog has some very helpful stuff on it; as I was getting caught up on some blog-reading tonight, these caught my attention.

How the Bible is Like a Jigsaw Puzzle: this caught my interest because I've recently had a couple discussions about the "mystery" of the Gospel... we don't get all the answers, at least not now.

John MacArthur on How to Serve Christians Who Are Needlessly Restrictive: this is an useful discussion on Christian liberty and Christian restraint, not exhaustive, just helpful

Imagine!

Esau lost his birthright with all its blessings largely through his lack of imagination.

(Alexander Whyte)

May God grant us lively imaginations to see the horizons of faith!

Christians at the Borders, Literal and Metaphorical

   A couple of friends have already blogged about this, but I thought I'd add a few thoughts to the immigration discussion.

 Tonight, I finished Dr. Danny Carroll's book Christians at the Border, which I think can best be described as a quietly reasoned plea for Christians of all origins in the United States to base their thinking on the volatile topic of immigration on the Word of God, not their political, economic, or social backgrounds.

The purpose of the book is not to solve the myriad of real problems found in the immigration discussion; it is to re-orient believers to what the Word says.  Personally, I have long felt instinctively that there was a Gospel way of approaching this topic which was being completely ignored; this book helped throw some light on why I sensed this: the Bible is a book that is completely relevant to the discussion, starting from Genesis 1, not just from Romans 13. 
I would highly recommend the book to anyone seeking to consider this issue as a Christian.

   Finally, I will add a few of my own thoughts on the topic.  Is it ok to break the laws of a nation where you are not a citizen?  If so, why are we concerned about the illegality of Central American citizens crossing into our country?  If not, is it right to smuggle Bibles into countries where that is illegal, or to witness there?  You will say that those are things commanded in the Bible, but I would ask whether it is not commanded in the Bible to feed and protect your family.  Does it not say that the one who does not provide for his own family is worse than an unbeliever (1 Timothy 5:8)?  You will quibble, and I certainly have not made an exact comparison, but maybe you should pause and reconsider.  Are the laws you defend just?  Does God call for you to defend all of the laws of this (or any) country?  As one Latino brother in Christ said, "Do they think we LIKE running across the desert?!" Nay, it is of necessity.  Do not "shut up" your "bowels of compassion" before you have had the opportunity to interact and feel the need and pain of your brothers and sisters!  And especially remember that many of these immigrants are in Christ together with you and me; do not judge rashly for they stand before the same Judge and call Him Father and Savior and Lord!  Search the Scriptures, my friends; and if you desire some aid, read Dr. Carroll's book.

   Incidentally, my previous post concerning The Good Mexican was spawned by a comment Dr. Carroll made in a sermon at Providence Bible Church.